NSF definition from Goodman et al (Science 2016): Reproducibility refers to the ability of a researcher to duplicate the results of a prior study using the same materials as were used by the original investigator.
Do we agree?
Perhaps we should be talking about “Methods Reproducibility”
It is not the truth, or even an approximation of truth Reproducing the same bias/mistake = same (wrong) results
If most researchers think this is important,
why are we not working reproducibly?
What are the obstacles?
Think-Pair-Share
http://www.socrative.com
Student login, Room Name :AHREN
*I will add a picture for this later….
http://www.socrative.com
Student login, Room Name :AHREN
F: Fusion - Fusing the topic with bad thoughts about failure:
“I can not do this”
“It is too hard”
“It will take me too long time”
E: Excessive Goals - We get excited and want to change everything immediately
This leads to to unrealistic expectations and a high risk of failure!
Hard to keep up long term
A: Avoidance of Discomfort - All types of change will feel uncomfortable and unfamiliar at first
Avoiding discomfort, taking the easy way out (=no change)
Change is scary!
R: Remoteness from Values - Easy to loose goal and purpose
“Why am I even doing this?”
Note: Get organised! does not help!
How did the comments in Socrative fit with FEAR acronym?
Think-Pair-Share
http://www.socrative.com
Student login, Room Name :AHREN